Quick answer

A bank reconciliation explains why the bank statement balance and the Cash balance in the accounting records differ at the same date. It identifies timing differences, book-side items, and errors, then determines the corrected cash balance. Missing or incorrect book entries require journal entries; bank-side timing differences do not.

The bank statement is an independent external record of transactions processed by the financial institution. The Cash ledger reflects transactions recorded by the business. Neither balance is automatically the correct balance: a deposit may be recorded by the business before the bank processes it, or the bank may charge a fee that has not reached the ledger.

Purpose of bank reconciliation

Reconciling cash makes the difference between timing and missing information visible. It also provides a disciplined review of unusual transactions and recording errors before financial statements are finalized. The reconciliation supports the ledger; it does not replace the bank statement, source documents, or management review.

Bank and book sides of a reconciliation

A deposit in transit is recorded by the business but not yet processed by the bank. An outstanding cheque is a payment recorded by the business that has not yet cleared the bank. Both are timing differences: they change the reconciliation without requiring another entry in the books.

Which balance changes, and whether an entry is needed
ItemSideEffectJournal entry?
Deposit in transitBankAdd to the bank statement balanceNo; already in the ledger
Outstanding chequeBankSubtract from the bank statement balanceNo; already in the ledger
Bank chargeBooksSubtract from the book balanceYes, if not recorded
Interest credited by bankBooksAdd to the book balanceYes, if not recorded
Returned customer chequeBooksSubtract from Cash and restore the receivableYes, if not recorded
Recording errorBooks or bankCorrect the side containing the errorDepends on who made it

Reconcile North Shore Design’s April cash balances

On April 30, North Shore Design’s bank statement shows $10,850 and its Cash ledger shows $10,600. The statement includes neither a $1,400 deposit in transit nor $1,950 of outstanding cheques. The bank also processed a $75 charge, $25 of interest, a $600 electronic customer collection, and a $300 returned cheque. None of these four items is yet recorded in the books. The business recorded one cheque as $90 when it was actually $640, so Cash is overstated by $550.

Balances at April 30 (Canadian dollars)
Bank sideAmountBook sideAmount
Bank statement balance$10,850Ledger Cash balance$10,600
Add: deposit in transit1,400Add: electronic collection600
Less: outstanding cheques(1,950)Add: bank interest25
Corrected cash balance$10,300Less: charge, returned cheque, and error(925)
Corrected cash balance$10,300

The book-side adjustments net to $600 + $25 − $75 − $300 − $550 = −$300. The ledger therefore moves from $10,600 to $10,300. The bank-side adjustments net to $1,400 − $1,950 = −$550, moving $10,850 to the same $10,300. The agreement is the test of the arithmetic, not proof that every item is valid.

Record items missing from the books

Each book-side item needs both a Cash effect and the account that explains why Cash changed:

  • The $75 bank charge increases Bank Charges Expense and decreases Cash.
  • The $25 bank credit increases Cash and records Interest Income.
  • The $600 electronic collection increases Cash and settles part of Accounts Receivable.
  • The $300 returned cheque removes the cash that did not clear and restores the customer’s receivable.
  • The bank cleared a $640 cheque, but the books reduced Cash by only $90. Cash therefore needs a further $550 credit, with a debit to the actual account used in the original entry. The exact debit depends on what the cheque paid; “original expense or payable” is not itself an account.
Journal entryRecord the bank chargeApril 30
Record the bank charge, April 30
AccountDebitCredit
Bank Charges Expense75
75
Journal entryRecord interest credited by the bank
Record interest credited by the bank
AccountDebitCredit
Cash25
25
Journal entryRecord the electronic customer collection
Record the electronic customer collection
AccountDebitCredit
Cash600
600
Journal entryReverse the returned customer cheque
Reverse the returned customer cheque
AccountDebitCredit
Accounts Receivable300
300

The source facts do not identify what the cheque purchased, so the account cannot be selected from the reconciliation alone. If the original cheque paid for office supplies consumed during the period, the correction would be:

Journal entryCorrect the cheque recording error for office supplies
Correct the cheque recording error for office supplies
AccountDebitCredit
Office Supplies Expense550
550

If it instead settled an existing payable, debit that actual payable account for $550. In either case, the credit to Cash is the same.

These five entries reduce the book balance by $300 in total. The deposit in transit and outstanding cheques remain entry-free timing differences.

Financial-statement effect

Financial-statement effect
StatementAccountEffectTiming
Balance sheetCashReports the corrected reconciled balanceApril 30
Income statementBank charges and interestExpenses and income recorded for AprilApril
Cash flow statementCashThe ending cash balance agrees; the reconciliation does not create a new cash flowApril 30
Balance sheet
AccountCash
EffectReports the corrected reconciled balance
TimingApril 30
Income statement
AccountBank charges and interest
EffectExpenses and income recorded for April
TimingApril
Cash flow statement
AccountCash
EffectThe ending cash balance agrees; the reconciliation does not create a new cash flow
TimingApril 30

Controls around cash

A reconciliation is a detective control: it helps find timing differences, missing entries, errors, and unusual activity after transactions have reached the bank or ledger. Preventive controls work earlier by limiting who can receive cash, initiate a payment, change banking instructions, or record the transaction. A useful cash-control routine combines both kinds.

Foundational controls over cash
Control objectiveExampleWhat it addresses
AuthorizationRequire appropriate approval for payments and transfers.Unapproved or improperly directed cash outflows.
Separate incompatible dutiesDo not give one person sole control over authorization, cash or banking access, recording, and reconciliation.An error or misuse being both committed and concealed.
Restrict accessLimit online-banking permissions, cheque stock, cash drawers, and changes to vendor or customer payment details.Unauthorized use or diversion of cash.
Use complete evidenceRetain deposit records, payment support, bank notices, and a clear reference between entries and source documents.Transactions that cannot be traced or supported.
Review promptlyHave someone independent of routine cash handling review the bank statement, reconciliation, unusual items, and old outstanding amounts.Errors or suspicious items remaining unresolved.

A small organization may not have enough people to separate every duty. In that case, direct owner or governance review of bank activity, payment approvals, supporting documents, and completed reconciliations can provide a compensating control. The reviewer must investigate unexplained differences rather than merely sign a reconciliation that was forced to agree.